Useful tactics for argumentative texts
Thursday, October 29th, 2009I took part in a seminar today and picked up some pointers on how to efficiently convey your idea or deal with an opponent in writing:
- Use words and phrase from the opponent, but make them your own
- Irony is always a potential threat to your credibility
- Join the readers and isolate the opponent (“we” approach) or join him/her in a dialogue and leave the readers to decide who is right (“you” approach)?
- A friendly and subtly critical introduction can be very effective
- Formulate question that people have asked themselves but never formed an opinion on, introduce critical questions from a neutral perspective to gain credibility
- An uncommented quote can often be more effective than one that is analysed
- Use “dichotomical questions” which leave the reader with just two choices
- Include and agree with the opponent’s arguments if they are relevant
- Adding details is a good way of strengthening credibility
- If the opponent is relying on the reader’s emotions, exaggerate these arguments to weaken them
- Be clear about your intention from the bery beginning
- Honesty and openness help your credibility
- To pretend that you know something better than you do works as long as the reader doesn’t know it better than you actually do
- If your opponent writes something unclear or abstract and potentially stupid, make it more concrete to illustrate the stupidity
- Always define what the reader should think, feel and do after reading
And someone had put the following words of wisdom on the door to the seminar room:

At some point I also allowed myself some doodling:


